Call Today (808) 395.2996

A COMPLETE LINE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY

NANO-TECHNOLOGY SURFACE AND WATER TREATMENTS

 
 

HOMEHYDROFLOW: INTROAPPLICATIONPRODUCTSTECHNOLOGYFAQWARRANTYCASE STUDIES

 
 
     

Surface Protective Coatings

• Introduction

• Technology

• Tiles & Grout

• Stainless Steel

• Stone & Cement

• Warranty

• Glass » Technology » FAQ

• About Nano Tek-On

• Testimonials

• Case Studies / Field Tests

• Contact Us

Warranties

NanoTek-On carries a diverse range of products for a wide spectrum of applications

   

HydroFlow - Case Studies / Field Tests

 

Cooling Tower - Marriott Koolina » pdf file

 

Case Study - Hotel Cooling Tower
Scale and Bio

Updated on January 7, 2014

 

Installer: Nano Tek-­-On, LLC. (HydroFLOW distributor in Hawaii).

Customer: MarrioL Koolina Beach Club, Oahu, Hawaii, USA.

Application: 500 Ton Cooling Tower.

Installed unit: HydroFLOW Custom 14" water conditioner on a cast iron pipe feeding the chillers.

Water source: Calcium Carbonate hardness of roughly 200 ppm and Silica hardness of roughly 50 ppm.

Installation date: September 10, 2013.

 

Success factors:• Reduce chemical usage by up to 75% while keeping the cooling tower readings within acceptable parameters.

• Significantly reduce maintenance costs.

• Reduce blow down water usage by up to 75%.

 

System diagram and installation point: 

 

HydroFLOW Water Conditioner

 

Installed HydroFLOW water condi2oner:

 

One of the 3 chillers:

 

Total bacteria count in the tower's recirculating water:

 

 

Baseline measurement with 100% biocide
(under 1,000 CFU)

 

Biocide chemicals kept CFU levels at a minimum

 

 

After 1.5 months with 50% less biocide

(between 1,000 to 5,000 CFU)

 

Slight raise in CFU count as HydroFLOW began to remove biofilm from the cooling tower

 

 

After 3 months with 75% less biocide

(under 1,000 CFU)

 

CFU count reduced back to under 1,000 CFU 

 

Blow down water consumption: 

 

* Prior to the installation of HydroFLOW, the conductivity of the cooling tower was maintained at roughly 1,500 µS via constant blow down (opened drain valve). The goal was to maintain conductivity between 1,500 to 1,800 µS while reducing water usage by up to 50% and keeping the cooling tower free of scale accumulation.

 

Note: Since the automatic blow down mechanism was not opera;onal, blow down was reduced by slightly closing the valve every 1-2 weeks. 

 

Other readings:

Iron - Fluctuated between 0.00 to 0.07.

Alkalinity - Started at 240. One week after HydroFLOW was installed it reduced to 180 and remained at that value.

Nitrate - Fluctuated between 560 to 640.

 

Results:

1. Lime scale accumulaVon stopped as soon as HydroFLOW was installed.

2. Anti-scalant and Anti-corrosive were completely discontinued after 1.5 months.

3. ExisVng scale and biofilm deposits were gradually removed.

4. After reducing the biocide by 75%, the total bacteria counts conVnued to be minimal.

5. Blow down was reduced by 75%. Note: Blow down can be reduced further with 10% side stream filtration.

6. Efficiency of chillers was maintained (no scale and biofilm accumulaVon in chiller tubes).

7. Under one year Return on Investment (ROI).